Which organizations operate in central asia

From the point of view of modern political science, according to scientists, not every national or ethnic entity with a single territory, external borders and unified administrative power can be called a state. The state should become, develop effective forms of functioning of administrative bodies, a bureaucratic apparatus, create a single socio- cultural space and achieve general civil self-identification, develop a single legal consciousness among the population.

In the CAR states there is a patriarchal social organization, a sociocultural space divided according to the clan and community characteristics; there is no civil self- identification, a single legal consciousness, political relations are authoritarian. This state of the states is the main brake on the integration processes in the region, it negates the effectiveness of the decisions taken, because while the integrationist state itself - the state - is in the stage of formation, the integration union cannot be perfect.

These associations for Moscow are a mechanism for coordination and cooperation in the implementation of jointly adopted decisions, and despite the fact that organizations formally pursue different goals, in fact, their functions often coincide.

Attention is drawn to the fact that the management bodies of organizations are also similar. It seems that the division of the "zones of responsibility" between. This was the reason for the internal contradictions existing in the SCO.

Initially, the organization had as its goal the fight against "three kinds of evil": separatism, extremism and terrorism. Gradually, these problems have lost relevance for most countries in Central Asia. Common to all members of the "Shanghai Five" is only the problem of religious extremism. However, the organization responds promptly to new security challenges and demonstrates its readiness to assume responsibility for ensuring security in Central Asia and for the overall development of the region.

The organization also makes active efforts to combat drug trafficking and drug smuggling from Afghanistan. However, the solution of such a large-scale problem is hardly possible with the efforts of one organization.

The Shanghai organization, which is not yet fully consolidated, as a whole is achieving certain successes in the field of ensuring security in the region.

At this stage, it needs to strengthen, resolve internal contradictions and bet on integration rather than expansion. Unlike the SCO, which combines both economic and military-political functions, the CSTO is a kind of security institution, which is responsible for both traditional and new threats and challenges in Central Asia.

In addition to solving border problems and preventing foreign policy threats, the CSTO solves such major problems as the fight against drug trafficking, for which the special operation "Channel" is carried out every year. The United States, for which Central Asia is a strategically important region, is also interested in maintaining stability on its territory. The US security strategy. Although Central Asia is the center of the intersection of geopolitical interests of the US, Russia and China, these states understand the danger of destabilizing the situation in the region and, albeit separately from each other, are taking steps to address security problems in Central Asia.

One of the coordinates of the transitional period of the international system is the establishment of a new relationship between the two domains Regional and global. In this context, the trend towards regionalism and the diffusion of regional institutions and organizations is one of the hallmarks of the transitional era governing international relations.

This transformation has made the concept of the region an indispensable role in shaping the world order of the future. If we compare the levels of conflict in the ASEAN countries and in the countries of Central Asia, objectively, the Central Asian states have more chances to create an effective regional security structure. A promising option here can be synchronization of the process of creating a regional security system with economic diversification and integration.

It is interesting that a number of ASEAN members in the early s threatened regional security with the collapse of the bipolar structure of international relations, with a sharp reduction in superpower regulation and the loss of a stable balance. This situation also remains characteristic to the post-Soviet space.

For the intercontinental countries of CA, security can be carried out at a trans boundary level, as well as ASEAN countries have begun integration at the maritime level. Thus, with the development of Asian economies, there are other horizons of cooperation and convergence The Asians opened up with each other. In this emerging space, regionalism and Asiaticism helped to rethink intercontinental interactions and deepen and expand inter-Asian ties.

It is likely that the satellite development of the Central Asian states, when the attraction of larger states will change the orbit of the smaller ones, will lead to the fragmentation of the emerging Central Asian geopolitical complex. ASEAN had the same situation. The initiative of creating ASEAN united small states, and managed to consolidate the efforts of small states and limit the pressure of larger states, thereby changing the geopolitical configuration in the Asia-Pacific region. Cornell is Director and S.

Image source: By: via silkroadstudies. Op-ed S. The National Interest , July 9, Silk Road Paper Svante E. Cornell and S. Analysis Svante E. The National Interest , November 14, Op-ed Svante E. The National Interest , October 5, Article S. Book S. For 15 years, the Analyst has brought cutting edge analysis of the region geared toward a practitioner audience.

Published in Analytical Articles. By Svante E. Read times Last modified on Tuesday, 04 December With no history of independent statehood, the five republics also diverged in their foreign relations approaches. Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan , for example, feared external influences, economic dependency, and loss of sovereignty, which made regional cooperation difficult. The continuation of regional integration, however, is more necessary than before for both internal and external reasons.

These republics are land-locked small economies. During Soviet times, their economies were mostly oriented toward Moscow, and economic links between the countries were not well established. Therefore, it would be advantageous to link their economies , as similar small, land-locked European countries, such as Austria, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, and Switzerland, have done.

Moreover, the Central Asian countries are joint users of energy, transport, gas, water, and irrigation networks. For example, the region obtains 90 percent of its water supply from two rivers the Amu Darya and the Syr Darya , but there are conflicts between the upstream countries Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan with abundant water and the downstream countries Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, and Turkmenistan with abundant oil and gas resources.

These countries need to find ways to effectively transport their extracted oil and gas to other countries by collaborating with one another.

In addition, the countries need to cooperate on security challenges, such as religious extremism, crime and terrorism, which often move across their borders. In particular, achieving peace and stability in Afghanistan has become a priority for the region.

Despite some domestic and regional bodies collaborating on resource-sharing matters, a severe lack of cooperation has exacerbated the issues. In the face of external influences, Central Asia should be able to have a say in what is best for the region. Moreover, individual countries face issues with China and Russia. UN officials have estimated that China has detained more than 1 million Muslims, including many ethnic Kazakhs.

Kyrgyzstan sees its culture appropriated by the Chinese government. The increasingly nationalist and revisionist tendencies in Russian politics have raised concerns in Kazakhstan, which has a large Russian-speaking population.

Central Asia should continue its efforts to form a comprehensive regional organization to stimulate economic growth and political stability while reinforcing sovereignty in the region. However, to do this, the republics have to overcome some economic and political obstacles. On the economic side, the volume of economic cooperation between Central Asian countries is still much lower than that of each of them with partners outside the region. Over this period, the Bank has supported the efforts of the countries to improve the living standards of their people, promote economic growth, and ensure that future generations benefit from sound environmental practices and social development.

The countries of Central Asia share more than just geography; they also share a similar legacy and, more importantly, a common vision for the future. Hence, the World Bank is increasingly approaching the development challenges of Central Asian countries through a regional lens. Such an approach facilitates cross-border cooperation and knowledge sharing and strengthens dialogue and collaboration between the countries. One example of this approach applied is the Migration and Remittances Peer-Assisted Learning MiRPAL network which shares country experiences in establishing dialogue on migration policy.

In Tajikistan and the Kyrgyz Republic, MiRPAL helped establish country-specific migration strategies and action plans which were approved by the governments.

The program identifies threats and opportunities, strengthens institutions, stimulates investments and builds a transparent knowledge platform to foster dialogue on issues of common concern. The Bank also supports power sector interregional cooperation initiatives between Central Asia and South Asia. Read the latest correspondence on the matter here -- link. The Bank is actively facilitating timely sharing of knowledge and experiences accumulated at the national and global levels, identifying gaps in knowledge, deepening coordination for addressing common challenges in a collaborative manner.

The Central Asia Regional Trade activity , launched in FY , is informing governments and stakeholders on number of components of a successful trade-agenda in the region, including analysis of outcomes and policies and recommendations to make trade integration more effective.